

NOTE: This is an archive site - we now have a new site.
Doubts over drug testing
By CHRIS DANIELS, New Zealand Herald, 2nd Feb 2001
Workplace drug testing may be of little use in stopping
workers getting stoned on the job.
A report written by Labour Department senior medical
practitioner Chris Walls has questioned the usefulness
of testing workers for drugs such as cannabis.
Workplace drug testing is common in the forestry,
fishing and transport industries.
Occupational Safety and Health is asking for feedback
on the report before putting together a policy.
In his paper, Dr Walls said there were "no useful
analytical measures to accurately indicate the level of
acute impairment" caused by cannabis.
Urine testing "has no practical use in assessing
impairment caused by marijuana use," he says.
Urine tests showed whether someone had used drugs,
but it could have been weeks ago. He said blood serum
tests, analysed by gas chromatography, could help show
those who had smoked cannabis in the previous 12
hours. Dr Walls also recommended that drug and alcohol
testing be handled by medical professionals, not human
relations departments.
In October last year, 20 police officers raided a Carter
Holt Harvey mill in Tokoroa and, with the permission of
management, had workers sniffed by a drug dog. No
drugs were found.
Health and safety officer for the Engineering, Printing
and Manufacturing Union (EPMU) Mike Ward said New
Zealand employers used drug testing in a punitive way.
Cheap urine testing was "a trendy way [for employers] to
be seen to be positive about health and safety," he said.
"They use valuable resources purely to get an answer to
the question 'Have they smoked a joint in the past
week?"'
Employers Federation chief executive Anne Knowles said
employers had worked with Dr Walls in putting together
drug testing guides, and knew about the link between
testing and impairment. She said employers used testing
only in a very limited and non-punitive way.
EPMU general secretary Andrew Little said even if a
collective employment contract allowed drug testing,
case law supported an employee's right to refuse.
Workers with individual contracts could also mount a
good argument against it.
Fletcher Challenge Forests spokeswoman Jacqui Miller
said the company tested urine for opiates, cocaine,
amphetamines and cannabis before hiring a worker, after
an accident and if they seemed impaired. Samples were
tested by the Institute of Environmental Science and
Research, which gauged impairment. If drugs were
present, but not enough to impair, ESR did not tell
Fletchers.
Air New Zealand technical and flying crew are tested for
drugs during routine medical check-ups.
The chief executive of wood products at Carter Holt
Harvey, Devon McLean, said drug testing was done only
before hiring a new worker and after any accidents. None
of these three companies used random tests.
|